The Global Patchwork
Six Jurisdictional Regimes
EU AI Act. US federal rules. Fifty state laws. No two are the same — and none of them wait. This is the regulatory landscape, and how RTFCT unifies compliance across it.
EUROPEAN UNION
EU AI Act
Tier-1 prohibitions already in force. Revenue-based penalties apply to any operator whose AI systems touch EU residents, regardless of where the operator sits.
UNITED STATES · FEDERAL
Executive Order 14409
The "voluntary" 30-day federal review places model documentation into the permanent record. Absence of history becomes evidence of negligence.
COLORADO
SB 26-189 (ADMT)
Colorado SB 26-189 (ADMT) — effective January 1, 2027. Notice and opt-out for automated decision-making in consequential domains. The replacement for SB 24-205, repealed on May 14, 2026.
CALIFORNIA
SB 942 / AB 2013
Transparency and training-data disclosure obligations with escalating daily penalties for non-compliance.
UNITED KINGDOM
Multi-Regulator Framework
No single AI law. The ICO, FCA, CMA, Ofcom, MHRA, and HSE each enforce AI compliance within their own domain — flexible, but complex.
THE GLOBAL PATCHWORK
50+ Overlapping Regimes
Every jurisdiction adds a new definition, a new anchor date, and a new penalty schedule. Policy documents cannot keep pace. Structure can.
One Structural Layer
RTFCT unifies the patchwork
ONE STRUCTURAL ANCHOR
RTFCT enforces controls at inference time, not on paper. A single interceptor layer satisfies the strictest common denominator across every regime.
1,095-DAY EVIDENCE LEDGER
Court-ready, cryptographically-signed records of every AI interaction — the retention floor that survives EU, federal, and state discovery alike.
JURISDICTION-AWARE POLICY
Versioned policy waves map each regulation to concrete enforcement rules, so a new state law is a configuration change, not a re-architecture.