WHY RTFCT
Why RTFCT?
Trust architecture for evidence-based governance. Not aspirational policy documents. Not dashboard exports. Structural proof that your AI systems operate within the bounds of law.
IMMUTABLE RECORDS
1,095-day evidentiary chain
Every AI interaction is cryptographically signed with SHA3-256 at the moment it occurs. Once sealed, the record cannot be altered, deleted, or disputed. This is not logging. This is court-ready evidence.
When regulators or litigators come calling, they do not want to see your policy documents. They want to see your evidentiary chain. RTFCT provides mathematical proof of coverage, not aspirational claims.
CRYPTOGRAPHIC SIGNING
SHA3-256 hash of every inference request, response, and policy evaluation. Independently verifiable. Zero-trust architecture.
IMMUTABLE STORAGE
1,095-day (3-year) retention in append-only R2 vault. Exceeds EU AI Act maximum requirements by 12 months.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Complete provenance from inference request to signed artifact. Every step documented, every hand-off recorded.
INTERCEPTOR GATEWAY
Real-time policy enforcement at inference time. Every request evaluated against your coverage matrix before it reaches the AI system.
COMPLETE LOGGING
Every interaction is logged to the VLT with a cryptographic signature, whether it is allowed or held for review. The record is created regardless of the outcome.
DATA RESIDENCY
Sovereign tier provides single-tenant infrastructure with full data residency control. Your data never leaves your jurisdiction.
SOVEREIGN INFRASTRUCTURE
Infrastructure-level enforcement
RTFCT is not a SaaS add-on. It is infrastructure that sits between your applications and AI systems. The Interceptor gateway evaluates every inference request against your coverage policy matrix in real-time.
Coverage is not a feature you enable. It is architecture you deploy. When enforcement is structural, violations become impossible rather than merely detectable.
REGULATORY WAVES
The enforcement timeline is not theoretical
AI coverage enforcement is arriving in waves. Organizations without structural coverage will face regulatory exposure at each stage. RTFCT ensures you are enforcement-ready before each wave arrives.
WAVE 1
January 1, 2026
IN FORCEUS State Transparency Laws
California AB 2013 training-data disclosure, Illinois HB 3773, and the CCPA updates become enforceable for any organization whose AI touches California or Illinois residents.
WAVE 2
August 2, 2026
ACTIVE DEADLINEEU Article 50 Transparency & California SB 942
Article 50 applies to general-purpose AI systems: transparency, systemic-risk evaluation, chatbot identification, and biometric disclosure. California SB 942 content provenance lands alongside it. High-risk obligations are not yet in scope.
WAVE 3
January 1, 2027
ROLLING ENFORCEMENTUS State ADMT Laws - Colorado, California, Texas
Colorado SB 26-189 (effective January 1, 2027), California AB 2013 provisions, Texas TRAIGA, and Connecticut SB 1103. Multi-jurisdictional coverage requirements for automated decision-making.
WAVE 4
December 2, 2027
UPCOMINGEU AI Act - Annex III High-Risk Enforcement
Full conformity requirements for Annex III high-risk AI systems: conformity assessments, CE marking, human oversight (Article 14), and post-market monitoring (Article 72) become mandatory.
WAVE 5
August 2, 2028
EMERGINGEU AI Act - Annex I Safety-Critical Systems
Annex I safety-embedded AI systems enter full enforcement, alongside accelerating sector-specific regimes (HIPAA AI guidance, SEC/FINRA supervision, FedRAMP AI controls).
THE CHOICE
Structural coverage before enforcement begins.
The era of aspirational governance is over. The era of structural coverage has begun. Choose your infrastructure commitment and be enforcement-ready before the next wave arrives.
VIEW PRICING